Vermont Chamber Releases Legislative Biennium Report

Vermont Chamber Releases Legislative Biennium Report, Emphasizes the Importance of Collaborative Solutions

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce has announced the release of its 2023-2024 Legislative Biennium Report, highlighting the critical role of state-level policymaking in shaping the business landscape and economy of Vermont.

“As we present this report, we are reminded of the resilience and dedication that define Vermont’s business community,” said Amy Spear, President of the Vermont Chamber. “Over the past two years, we’ve navigated significant legislative activity and unprecedented challenges that have both tested and strengthened our collective resolve.”

The report underscores the essential need for active engagement and advocacy in Montpelier. “It is imperative that a diverse range of perspectives is included in the policymaking process,” added Spear. “True innovation and balanced policy outcomes arise from collaboration—a practice central to the work of the Vermont Chamber.”

Highlights from the 2023–2024 Legislative Biennium Report:

  • Advocacy Efforts: The Vermont Chamber’s advocacy team, led by Vice President of Government Affairs Megan Sullivan, testified 55 times before legislative committees and monitored 964 committee hearings, ensuring that the voice of the business community was heard.
  • Legislative Engagement: The Chamber hosted with 14 legislative interns, fostering the next generation of leaders and advocates.
  • Economic Focus: Amid record-high government spending supported by one-time federal pandemic relief funding, the Chamber emphasized the need to return state spending to sustainable levels to address the affordability crisis impacting businesses, individuals, and families.
  • Policy Impact: Several key bills beneficial to Vermont’s business community were successfully passed, while numerous proposed tax increases that could have strained the state’s economic climate did not advance.
  • Voting Transparency: Incumbent legislators’ voting records on key economic issue. This resource provides businesses with clarity on how their Senators and Representatives voted, enabling informed political engagement and advocacy to strengthen Vermont’s business environment.

As election season progresses, it is imperative for candidates to prioritize economic growth and recognize the significant role Montpelier plays in shaping Vermont’s business landscape. Looking to 2025, the Vermont Chamber’s commitment to balanced, data-driven, and pragmatic approaches remains strong. The Vermont Chamber advocacy team will be visiting communities across Vermont in the coming months to preview the full slate of business issues expected in the State House during the upcoming legislative session.

Landmark Act 250 Modernization Bill Becomes Law

Landmark Act 250 Modernization Bill Becomes Law

Lawmakers voted to override the Governor’s veto of H.687, marking the final passage of the historic compromise that has been a monumental undertaking for policymakers and stakeholders this session. The successful passage of the bill will immediately exempt the building of housing units across Vermont, which is a top priority for the Vermont business community. The Vermont Chamber has been engaged on this bill throughout the session to secure this crucial provision, among others.

There will be an opportunity to address the areas of concern that led to the Governor’s veto decision in the next biennium. In the meantime, the passage of this bill marks an important step forward to achieving common goals. Act 250 exemptions for housing will start immediately and a location-based jurisdiction approach will see full exemptions in smart growth areas soon. No single piece of legislation will absolve the housing crisis that has been generations in the making and more work needs to be done to find solutions that get at the root of the problem. The Vermont Chamber remains committed to working with legislators and the Governor’s administration in the years ahead on further policy solutions for Vermonters. 

Senators Listen to Vermont Businesses, Uphold Veto on Data Privacy

Senators Listen to Vermont Businesses, Uphold Veto on Data Privacy

Business voices played a crucial role in ensuring an extreme data privacy bill, in its current form, did not become law. While businesses support comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation, H.121 was rife with provisions that lacked clarity and would have unintended consequences for businesses, consumers, and the Vermont economy. The Governor and Senators listened to their constituent businesses on this issue and voted accordingly so an improved bill can be passed in the next biennium.

Earlier this session, when Vermont businesses tried to provide input during the policymaking process, they were dismissed by some politicians as misinformed or as being influenced by big tech. However, a bipartisan group of fifteen Senators decisively rejected that misleading narrative and voted to uphold the veto, deciding to pump the breaks and return to the drawing board. See how your Senators voted, here and how your Representatives voted, here. On the floor, Senator Christopher Bray (D-Addison) stated, “The uniformity of the concerns that I heard from the business community made me re-read and ask questions…there is so much uncertainty in [H.121] that it has Vermont businesses deeply concerned about the consequences of enactment… there is wisdom in pausing when you find that the work you have done, no matter how well intention, may have negative consequences.” Senator Ann Cummings (D-Washington), who also voted to uphold the veto, stated, “We need to make sure the business community supports this… We need to make sure we get this right because it is a very serious issue.”

The outpouring of feedback from Vermont businesses in recent weeks no doubt played a key role in securing this result. The successful veto of H.121 means that a more balanced bill can now be crafted in a future session. The Vermont Chamber is committed to working with legislators in the next biennium to pass an improved bill that aligns with neighboring states via a process that respects all voices at the table.

Well-Intentioned Data Privacy Bill Misses the Mark

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

H.121, a data privacy bill passed by the legislature and vetoed by Governor Scott, is a well-intentioned attempt to protect consumers’ personal data that misses the mark. In its current form, this bill will create major problems for Vermont’s businesses, consumers, and economy. Our organizations strongly support comprehensive data privacy legislation, but H.121 goes far beyond the measures adopted in neighboring states like Connecticut and New Hampshire, which we support as workable models. H.121 goes far beyond these measures and would make it harder for businesses to serve their Vermont customers than to serve those in other states. 

Unfortunately, when Vermont businesses tried to provide input throughout this policy-making process, they were routinely dismissed by some in the legislature as misinformed or as being influenced by big tech. This is an inaccurate characterization. Further, it has had a chilling effect on the ability of Vermont businesses to engage in the legislative process for fear of being villainized and of ramifications for their businesses. 

This bill will put Vermont businesses at a serious disadvantage, making them less competitive than businesses in other states, raising their marketing and compliance costs, and exposing them to potential legal battles. H.121, as passed by the Legislature, is unworkable. It threatens the survival of many local businesses and would put a serious dent in the Vermont economy.

H.121 could also spell the end of loyalty and other programs that many Vermonters benefit from. These programs, like airline miles, hotel and credit card points, multi-mountain ski passes, savings on gasoline, and more, are all at risk. Under the new law, it would be too difficult, expensive, and risky for businesses to continue offering these programs and benefits to Vermonters.

Unfortunately, H.121 is not balanced legislation. Vermont should join our neighboring statesby adopting a comprehensive privacy law that creates regional alignment. This would protect consumers and hold bad actors responsible while helping businesses to comply. H.121 as drafted, does not accomplish this. The 105-page document is rife with provisions that lack clarity and will lead to unintended consequences.

We urge legislators to support Governor Scott’s veto of H.121 and return next year to work on creating a better bill. Vermont can have strong privacy laws that protect consumers without hurting local businesses. Let’s find a solution that works for everyone.

Signed,

Associated Industries of Vermont

Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce

Heating and Cooling Contractors of Vermont

Vermont Association of Broadcasters

Vermont Chamber of Commerce

Vermont Fuel Dealers Association

Vermont Independent Restaurants

Vermont Retail and Grocers Association

Vermont Ski Areas Association

Vermont Technology Alliance

Vermont Vehicle and Automotive Distributors Association

Legislature Adjourns: What Businesses Need to Know

Legislature Adjourns: What Businesses Need to Know

The House and Senate gaveled out on Saturday at 2:07 AM and 1:18 AM respectively, following a tumultuous day of negotiations. Bills will now head to the Governor for his consideration and potential veto. Legislators are then set to return to the State House on June 17 to try and garner the two-thirds vote majority to override his decisions.

Below are the top headlines that you should know:

  • Housing and Act 250 Modernization: Vermont lawmakers and stakeholders have achieved a noteworthy feat: passing substantial reforms that exempt the building of housing units from Act 250 in villages, neighborhoods, and downtowns across the state. The legislation represents a historic compromise that will help reduce regulatory barriers to meet workforce housing needs. Following nearly a year of negotiations, the bill is set to introduce a process to create a tiered location-based approach through extensive community engagement over the next three years. It will tailor the applicability of Act 250 based on a development’s location and environmental sensitivity. It will also establish a professional board to make the Act 250 process more predictable, fair, and timely in every district. The Governor has been critical of the bill throughout the session, but it remains to be seen if he will sign it into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without his signature.
  • Property Taxes: The Vermont House and Senate reached a consensus on the annual property tax bill aimed at funding school districts’ budgets. The bill would increase the average education property tax bill by a crushing 13.8%. Key provisions that brought it down from 18% include utilizing a one-time state budget surplus of $25 million to mitigate property tax rates, introducing a new 3% surcharge tax on short-term rentals, and a $14.7 million tax on internet software access (aka the “cloud tax”). The absence of immediate structural reforms to education financing remains deeply concerning and the establishment of a study committee on the issue does little to temper fears that Vermonters will be facing extreme increases again, next year. All eyes will be on the Legislature in June to see if there are enough votes to sustain the Governor’s likely veto, and if a veto letter will provide further suggestions on how to reduce the double-digit increase before Vermonters receive their tax bills.
  • Data Privacy: In the final hours, Senators walked back their version of a data privacy bill that would have been regionally compatible and removed a private right of action. The Vermont Chamber has consistently advocated for three essential pillars, all of which we have advocated for in other policy proposals as well: regional compatibility, empowering the Attorney General as the sole enforcement authority, and funding small business education and training through trusted in-state technical assistance providers. The bill will now be sent to the Governor for his consideration and, if enacted, it would introduce rigorous and untested regulations impacting businesses of all sizes. While it aims to enhance consumer privacy, a goal supported by the Vermont Chamber, it also presents significant challenges for businesses. It would require substantial adjustments to data management practices that could impact operational efficiency, and leave education and outreach to the Attorney General.
  • Public Safety: To address the statewide uptick in retail theft, a bill passed by the House and Senate amends the penalties associated with various theft thresholds by increasing the penalty per repeat incident. Currently, theft of merchandise valued at less than $900 constitutes a misdemeanor offense, regardless of repeat offenses. The bill, which still awaits a verdict from the Governor, classifies a third offense as a felony if the stolen property falls within the $250 to $900 value range. This would entail substantial fines and potential jail time.
  • FY25 Budget: A conference committee reconciled differences before sending an $8.6 billion state budget to the Governor, who signaled at a press conference he would likely sign the bill, despite a 0.25% increase over his proposed budget.
  • Renewable Energy Standard: The Legislature passed a bill significantly expanding the state’s Renewable Energy Standard, with most retail electricity providers required to reach 100% renewable energy by 2030, and municipal providers by 2035. The bill has estimated cumulative costs to ratepayers ranging between $150 million and $450 million over the period from FY 2025 to FY 2035, with potential incremental electricity rate increases up to 6.7% by FY 2035.
  • Chemical Regulation: A bill banning chemicals such as PFAS, phthalates, formaldehyde, mercury, and lead from various consumer products is headed to the Governor for his consideration. The bill aligns with similar legislation in California, Minnesota, Maine, and Washington.
  • Liquor Liability Insurance: A miscellaneous alcohol bill passed by the Legislature delays the implementation of mandatory liquor liability insurance until July 1, 2026. This essential measure would meet the need for the insurance market to adjust due to increasing premium rates and reduced capacity for insurers to accept risk.
  • Job Advertisement Requirements: A bill mandating the inclusion of a wage range in job advertisements has been sent to the Governor for consideration. If signed, the law will go into effect in 2025 with a mandate for the Attorney General to work with stakeholders on education and outreach.
  • Captive Audience: A bill that limits the ability of a business to communicate with employees, if an employee felt the communication was of a religious or political nature, has passed and will move to the Governor for review.
  • Recovery and Resiliency: A bill that ensures considerations for businesses while enhancing government responses to natural disasters is expected to pass. The Vermont Chamber advocated for businesses to be included in the scope of the bill early in the session.
  • Business Incentives: Several studies and changes to Vermont’s primary business incentive, the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive (VEGI) program, were considered in the last two years. Ultimately, all that was agreed to was a two-year extension of the programmatic VEGI sunset.

Senate Working to Mitigate Property Tax Increases Below 13%

Senate Working to Mitigate Property Tax Increases Below 13%

The Senate Finance Committee only had one week to work on a critical bill which, as passed by the House, would raise property taxes by 15-18%, create a cloud tax (including software as a service, infrastructure as a service, and platform as a service), and add a 1.5% surcharge to short term rentals. The Chair of the committee, Ann Cummings (D-Washington) continues to be a champion for balance and well-informed policymaking this session and is working to get the property tax increase below 13%. She is taking a measured approach to the issue, with an understanding that raising other taxes to achieve this would also have implications.

One measure under discussion is leveraging the influx of general fund revenue from the solar eclipse to buy down $25 million. An additional proposal is borrowing $20 million from our reserves. However, the Treasurer is scheduled to testify later today that using reserve funds would pose a risk to Vermont’s credit rating. He previously testified in the House Ways in Means Committee on these concerns. The Senate Finance Committee is also considering a handful of sales taxes on items such as candy, sugar-sweetened beverages, clothing over $150, and vaping tobacco. Separately, following business testimony on the anticipated cost and complexity of a widespread cloud tax, the committee appears ready to scale back the House proposal to a tax on software as a service. The committee is expected to work late into this evening to ensure they vote the bill out.

Earlier this week, the committee considered transitioning from the proposed 1.5% short-term rental tax to a .5% rooms tax increase. The Vermont Chamber and members of the lodging community voiced concerns that another tax increase on the lodging industry could have far-reaching ramifications for the visitor economy. Kim Donahue, Owner of the Inn at the Round Barn Farm, testified that for every dollar spent at her business, visitors spend another $4 at neighboring businesses. These figures are particularly notable at scale when even a slight increase in taxation could redirect major events like wedding spending to neighboring states, jeopardizing Vermont’s competitiveness.

Important Appeal Provisions Secured in Act 250 Modernization and Housing Bill

Important Appeal Provisions Secured in Act 250 Modernization and Housing Bill

Amid a lengthy debate and amendments, the Senate is poised to approve H.687, which will be another step towards codifying the historic agreement on location-based jurisdiction. The bill would then need to go back to the House to review changes. The bill removes barriers to residential development in smart growth areas with interim exemptions. Notably, the Vermont Chamber successfully advocated for Act 250 appeals to remain with the Environmental Court. In a compromise to secure this, the future of appeals would be studied, and a report would be due back to the legislature for further consideration in 2026.

Here is a breakdown of much of what the Senate version of the bill would do over the next 3 years:

Development Exemptions: Establishes exemptions for all development in Tier 1A up to 49 units of housing in mixed-use developments in Tier 1B. Interim exemptions include:

  • All housing within downtowns until July 1, 2028.
  • Up to 75 units in new town centers, growth centers, and neighborhood development areas until July 1, 2028.
  • Up to 50 units within ¼ mile of village centers with zoning and in urbanized areas of 50,000 people near transit routes until July 1, 2028.

Name Change and Authority Expansion: The Natural Resources Board becomes the Land Use Review Board (LURB), the five-member board will be appointed by the Governor and have the authority to hear appeals and review regional plans and maps.

Tier 1A Area Application Process: Municipalities can apply from 2026 or after regional plan approval, with LURB guidelines issued by 2026.

Review of Applications for Tier 1A: LURB to manage the workload of District Commissions. Leaves Act 250 permit appeals at the Environmental Division of the Superior Court and will further study the issue.

Act 250 Amendments: Definitions added for forest blocks and habitat connectors. Rules to be adopted for Act 250 in areas with highly sensitive natural resources administration and mapping.

Regional Planning Process: LURB to review future land use maps and Tier 1B designations. RPCs submit to LURB plans and maps which must comply with requirements. Village areas are given Tier 1B status unless the town requests not to have it.

Appeal Changes: The threshold for appeals increased from 10 to 25 people.

Taxation Adjustments: A new property transfer tax rate of 2.5% for residential properties that will not be used as a principal residence, are fit for habitation all year, and are not used for a long-term rental. A temporary education property tax exemption was introduced for flood-impacted communities.

Safety Guidance for Short-Term Rental (STR) Operators: The Division of Fire Safety provides health and safety rules guidance for STR platforms; operators are required to post guidance.

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Vital changes were made by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee before they unanimously passed the data privacy bill. The legislation is now a strong consumer privacy bill without placing an undue burden on Vermont businesses. In particular, the committee removed the controversial private right of action which would result in collateral damage of rampant litigation placing undue strain on businesses and non-profits of all sizes. It instead asks a technology-based state council under the purview of the Agency of Digital Services to look into a path forward. Additionally, the bill brings it back to a place of interoperability with other New England state data privacy laws. The bill will likely be on the Senate floor for a vote next week.

Businesses testified in the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee on the importance of the Senate changes. Jim Hall, CEO of the Vermont Country Store, stated that the House-passed version of the bill would effectively slow down the economy. We encourage more businesses to reach out to their House and Senate members and ask them to support that bill as it has been amended by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee.

House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

Amid a $200 million increase in education spending, instead of making meaningful reform with cost containment measures, the House Ways and Means Committee has advanced legislation that includes double-digit property tax increases and adds more expenses for businesses. To pay for an increased property tax credit, the non-homestead tax would increase to 18%, 3% higher than the homestead rate. A cloud tax would also be implemented, including software as a service, platform as a service, and infrastructure as a service. Additionally, the bill proposes a $200,000 “Commission on the Future of Public Education” that would take 18 months to further study and make recommendations on how to improve the system. This means that rate increases will not be addressed this year and Vermonters could face another high increase again next year.

In written testimony, the Commissioner of the Tax Department stated, “The proposal to increase property tax credits for FY25 is not a reduction in total property taxes, but a cost shift that renters and businesses will pay. This is a puzzling approach when you consider the affordability crisis renters and employers currently confront.” Sending the issue to yet another study would not address the immediate needs of Vermonters. Meanwhile, in addition to property tax increases, the House has already passed $125 million in tax increases earlier this session.

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise With a Poison Pill

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise with a Poison Pill

The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee combined the Senate’s housing bill with the House’s Act 250 modernization bill, creating a 171-page omnibus bill. While much of the legislation incorporates a historic compromise on Act 250, a substantial poison pill remains. Appeals of Act 250 permits would move from the environmental courts to a newly established professional board. The Vermont Chamber is advocating against this transition. A legal appeal of a complicated development process requires a legal review in a court, not an informal review by a politically appointed quasi-judicial board that does not have legal expertise.

The Vermont Chamber has supported a compromise of establishing a working group to dig into underlying issues that result in Act 250 appeals leading to timely and expensive disputes and ultimately development delays and how best to address them. The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee has done a walk-through of the bill and is looking at opportunities to bolster parts of the bill that will address Vermont’s housing crisis. With only weeks remaining in the session, the bill still has several more hoops to jump through before reaching the Governor’s desk. As it currently stands, it is poised for a veto.