Balanced Data Privacy Bill Receives Unanimous Support in the Senate

Balanced Data Privacy Bill Receives Unanimous Support in the Senate

This week, the Vermont Senate unanimously passed a comprehensive data privacy bill, signaling strong bipartisan support for the protection of Vermonters’ personal data and Vermont’s economy. The bill, which was supported by Vermont business organizations, nonprofits, and medical providers, aligns with the privacy framework passed in other New England states and outlined in Governor Scott’s veto last year. By passing the bill, the Senate has sent a clear message: Vermonters deserve strong privacy protections, and Senate lawmakers are listening to the concerns of trusted local organizations.

During the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affair’s review of the bill, Senate Majority Leader Kesha Ram Hinsdale expressed the Senate’s commitment to the bill, stating, “I will say on the record, if you touch a hair on this bill’s head it may not garner the votes in the Senate to pass.” This statement underscores the Senate’s resolve to keep the bill intact as it moves to the House. Despite external pressures from out-of-state interests trying to push Vermont toward more extreme policies, the Senate has prioritized a solution that balances privacy rights with the needs of Vermont’s economy.

The bill was reported by Bennington Senator Rob Plunkett, a meaningful moment for the businesses in his district, which have been a prominent voice on this issue. This action by the Senate highlights the importance of creating a privacy framework that protects local businesses from unnecessary legal risks. As the bill moves to the House, the Vermont Chamber hopes to see the same commitment to a regionally compatible approach that supports Vermont’s economy while safeguarding privacy. We thank the Senate for their thoughtful, bipartisan leadership and urge the House to follow this show of leadership.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Halfway Point: Taking Stock of the Legislative Session and Vermont’s Affordability Challenges

Halfway Point: Taking Stock of the Legislative Session and Vermont’s Affordability Challenges

With crossover complete, the Vermont Chamber advocacy team provides a comprehensive status update on Vermont’s most pressing affordability issues—education and property taxes, housing, healthcare, and business cost and regulation. Early measures in education and property taxes show promise in easing financial pressures, while proposed reforms in housing and healthcare remain under review amid evolving priorities. Key issues are summarized below.

Education Finance and Delivery

Following an average property tax increase of 14% last year, Vermont’s education finance and delivery system has reached a critical inflection point. With a clear focus on progressivity, transparency, and local control, the Legislature is examining the Administration’s proposals, which aim to address nearly every aspect of the current education finance framework—from how property tax credits are calculated to new measures designed to reduce disparities among school districts. However, significant questions remain regarding the potential for cost containment and the methodologies that will be employed to achieve it.

  • Yield Bill Passes Ways and Means: Curbing Property Tax Hikes: The House Ways and Means Committee passed the yield bill (9-2-0), proposing a uniform change to both non-homestead and homestead property tax rates for the upcoming fiscal year. The bill uses the one-time $77.2 million general fund transfer proposed by the Administration to buy down the property tax rate to an average increase of 1.1% versus the 5.9% increase that would have been realized without the transfer.
  • Education Reform Gets More Time: Due to the complexity of education reform—covering proposed changes to district sizes, funding, governance of Centers for Technical Education (CTE), prekindergarten, and a potential shift to a foundation formula—lawmakers are expected to take additional time beyond the standard crossover deadline. These decisions will ultimately determine whether cost containment can be achieved this session.

Housing

The continued lack of affordable housing is making living in Vermont more challenging for workers and families. Thoughtful reforms—such as streamlining permitting, encouraging higher-density and mixed-use developments, and revising financing mechanisms—are needed to help stabilize prices, support community resilience, and increase housing output.

  • Housing-Focused Infrastructure Financing Gains Momentum: Public infrastructure remains a major barrier to housing development. A housing-focused version of the long-proposed project-based Tax Increment Financing (TIF) program has gained momentum in the Senate, alongside a bond bank program designed to extend and enhance water and sewer service capacity for housing in municipalities.
  • Middle Income Programs Get Policy Approval; Budget Approval Pending: Programs designed to bridge the financing gap for housing developers or homebuyers have received support in policy committees, although the final budget for these initiatives has yet to be determined.
  • Act 250 Appeals Study Expedited: The timeline for a study on Act 250 appeals was expedited to allow the Legislature to develop policy proposals in time for the next session.

Healthcare

Commercial healthcare premiums have increased by double digits over the past three years while healthcare providers continue to face staffing and funding challenges in delivering the access to care communities need; 45% of respondents to the Vermont Chamber’s Business Climate Survey have adjusted their benefits in response to rising costs—with smaller businesses feeling the impact the most.

  • Reference-Based Pricing: Reforms Under Consideration to Curb Costs: In efforts to control costs, the Senate is moving forward with a proposal to implement reference-based pricing (RBP) before phasing in global hospital budgets.
  • New Law Unmerges Markets, Double-Digit Premium Increases Likely: In a swift legislative move, Vermont’s Legislature permanently unmerged the individual and group healthcare markets—a measure signed into law by Governor Scott—to shield small businesses from the higher costs of the individual market. However, the path to addressing the underlying cost drivers remains unclear and another year of double-digit increases may be unavoidable.
  • Workforce and Demographic Challenges: Further Action Needed: While current programs remain essential, little progress has been made in developing solutions to address the growing staffing shortages and demographic shifts impacting the healthcare system. Additional proactive measures are needed to ensure long-term workforce sustainability and maintain access to quality care.

Vermont’s Business Climate

The Vermont Chamber’s Business Climate Survey revealed a stark reality: respondents consistently voiced frustration with Vermont’s business environment, citing rising operational costs, regulatory hurdles, and a lack of workforce availability. The Vermont Chamber’s focus remains aligned with what Vermonters expressed at the polls in November—addressing affordability, spurring economic growth, and tackling Vermont’s toughest challenges head-on. 

  • Military Retiree Pension Exemption Ignored: Despite strong bipartisan support in the House and Senate, legislation that would exempt the pensions of military retirees and survivor benefits from taxation has not been taken off the wall, leaving Vermont as the second least desirable state for military retirees.  Vermont’s veteran population is declining at a rate of 2.7% annually, compared to a national decrease of 1.6%.
  • Balanced Comprehensive Data Privacy Gains Traction: A Comprehensive data privacy bill has received unanimous committee approval as it moves through the Senate. While compliance with this law will carry costs, the bill aligns with data privacy standards in other New England states and avoids exposing businesses to costly legal fees by excluding a private right of action.
  • Electricity Rate Increases: Two Senate committees have advanced a bill that is raising serious concerns due to its potential to increase electric costs for ratepayers.
  • New Business Taxes and Fees Off the Table for Now: While new and increased taxes were front of mind last year, tax increases targeting Vermont businesses have been off the table thus far.

Looking Ahead: What’s Next for Affordability Policy?

As the Legislature moves into the second half of the session, many of these affordability proposals will face significant hurdles in securing final approval and funding, and things can change dramatically as bills move from one chamber to the other. Proposals that seemed settled in one committee may be completely rewritten or stalled as they face new scrutiny and ideology. Several efforts to deliver some form of affordability remain in play, but competing priorities and budget constraints will shape what ultimately moves forward. Adding to the uncertainty, federal funding fluctuations could impact healthcare, infrastructure, and workforce programs, forcing lawmakers to make difficult trade-offs. The Vermont Chamber will remain engaged at every step, ensuring that affordability remains at the forefront as these critical policies take shape.

Senate Institutions Committee Advances Balanced Data Privacy Bill

Senate Institutions Committee Advances Balanced Data Privacy Bill

The Senate Institutions Committee has unanimously (5-0-0) advanced a data privacy bill that reflects the needs and concerns of Vermonters, including the Vermont business community. The original proposal in S.71, heavily influenced by out-of-state special interests, contained extreme provisions which would have placed costly and unworkable burdens on local businesses. A similar version of the bill was passed last year but was ultimately vetoed by Governor Phil Scott due to concerns about its lack of regional compatibility and the inclusion of a private right of action. With testimony and advocacy from Vermont stakeholders, including the Vermont Chamber of Commerce, lawmakers have instead advanced a more balanced approach that aligns with the New England model of data privacy protections.

The revised bill strengthens consumer data protections while ensuring that compliance remains practical for businesses of all sizes. Importantly, the legislation does not include a private right of action, a provision which could result in an influx of lawsuits or threats of lawsuits against Vermont businesses, creating uncertainty and increased legal costs. Following the New England model, the committee supported a framework that promotes responsible data practices without stifling economic growth or innovation. The new version of the bill also addresses requests outlined in Governor Scott’s veto letter, ensuring that Vermont’s approach to data privacy aligns with regional standards and avoids placing undue burdens on local businesses and nonprofits.

The bill will now go before the full Senate for further debate and a vote before moving to the House for additional consideration. The Vermont Chamber will continue engaging with lawmakers to ensure that the final legislation maintains a strong balance between consumer privacy and business viability, while also meeting the standards set forth by Governor Scott. As the House begins its review, the Chamber encourages Vermont businesses to stay informed and involved in the process to ensure their voices are heard.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Vermont Chamber Advocates for Economic Growth and Housing Solutions 

Vermont Chamber Advocates for Economic Growth and Housing Solutions

The Vermont Chamber advocacy team engaged with both House and Senate committees to outline priorities aimed at fortifying Vermont’s economy. Discussions centered on housing affordability, workforce challenges, regulatory reforms, technology, and positioning Vermont as a premier relocation destination. 

Tourism and manufacturing were highlighted as economic pillars, each contributing $3 billion annually and employing thousands of Vermonters. The Chamber’s Foundation, the Vermont Futures Project, was spotlighted for its focus on long-term economic planning, ensuring these critical sectors continue to drive statewide prosperity. 

Housing availability and affordability took center stage as a pressing concern. The Chamber will continue advocating for meaningful reforms to reduce construction costs, improve infrastructure, and expand access, emphasizing the importance of addressing Vermont’s demographic challenges and workforce gaps to sustain economic vitality. 

The Chamber emphasized the integral connection between business growth and wage growth, presenting data that reinforces the need for collaborative efforts to support businesses. Economic development remains a priority for the Vermont Chamber, and the team is poised to work alongside lawmakers to ensure businesses have the resources and environment necessary to thrive. 

To bolster advocacy efforts surrounding technology issues, the Vermont Chamber introduced attorney Josh Diamond from Dinse, who the Chamber has hired on retainer. With his extensive legal expertise and six years of experience as Vermont’s Deputy Attorney General, Josh will provide critical insights and representation for Vermont’s business community on emerging technology challenges. 

The team will do additional introductions next week and will dive into expert testimony on legislation. Through proactive collaboration with lawmakers, stakeholders, and industry leaders, the Vermont Chamber continues to champion policies that advance Vermont’s economy and enhance quality of life for all. 

SHARE THIS ARTICLE

RECENT NEWS

Senators Listen to Vermont Businesses, Uphold Veto on Data Privacy

Senators Listen to Vermont Businesses, Uphold Veto on Data Privacy

Business voices played a crucial role in ensuring an extreme data privacy bill, in its current form, did not become law. While businesses support comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation, H.121 was rife with provisions that lacked clarity and would have unintended consequences for businesses, consumers, and the Vermont economy. The Governor and Senators listened to their constituent businesses on this issue and voted accordingly so an improved bill can be passed in the next biennium.

Earlier this session, when Vermont businesses tried to provide input during the policymaking process, they were dismissed by some politicians as misinformed or as being influenced by big tech. However, a bipartisan group of fifteen Senators decisively rejected that misleading narrative and voted to uphold the veto, deciding to pump the breaks and return to the drawing board. See how your Senators voted, here and how your Representatives voted, here. On the floor, Senator Christopher Bray (D-Addison) stated, “The uniformity of the concerns that I heard from the business community made me re-read and ask questions…there is so much uncertainty in [H.121] that it has Vermont businesses deeply concerned about the consequences of enactment… there is wisdom in pausing when you find that the work you have done, no matter how well intention, may have negative consequences.” Senator Ann Cummings (D-Washington), who also voted to uphold the veto, stated, “We need to make sure the business community supports this… We need to make sure we get this right because it is a very serious issue.”

The outpouring of feedback from Vermont businesses in recent weeks no doubt played a key role in securing this result. The successful veto of H.121 means that a more balanced bill can now be crafted in a future session. The Vermont Chamber is committed to working with legislators in the next biennium to pass an improved bill that aligns with neighboring states via a process that respects all voices at the table.

Well-Intentioned Data Privacy Bill Misses the Mark

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

H.121, a data privacy bill passed by the legislature and vetoed by Governor Scott, is a well-intentioned attempt to protect consumers’ personal data that misses the mark. In its current form, this bill will create major problems for Vermont’s businesses, consumers, and economy. Our organizations strongly support comprehensive data privacy legislation, but H.121 goes far beyond the measures adopted in neighboring states like Connecticut and New Hampshire, which we support as workable models. H.121 goes far beyond these measures and would make it harder for businesses to serve their Vermont customers than to serve those in other states. 

Unfortunately, when Vermont businesses tried to provide input throughout this policy-making process, they were routinely dismissed by some in the legislature as misinformed or as being influenced by big tech. This is an inaccurate characterization. Further, it has had a chilling effect on the ability of Vermont businesses to engage in the legislative process for fear of being villainized and of ramifications for their businesses. 

This bill will put Vermont businesses at a serious disadvantage, making them less competitive than businesses in other states, raising their marketing and compliance costs, and exposing them to potential legal battles. H.121, as passed by the Legislature, is unworkable. It threatens the survival of many local businesses and would put a serious dent in the Vermont economy.

H.121 could also spell the end of loyalty and other programs that many Vermonters benefit from. These programs, like airline miles, hotel and credit card points, multi-mountain ski passes, savings on gasoline, and more, are all at risk. Under the new law, it would be too difficult, expensive, and risky for businesses to continue offering these programs and benefits to Vermonters.

Unfortunately, H.121 is not balanced legislation. Vermont should join our neighboring statesby adopting a comprehensive privacy law that creates regional alignment. This would protect consumers and hold bad actors responsible while helping businesses to comply. H.121 as drafted, does not accomplish this. The 105-page document is rife with provisions that lack clarity and will lead to unintended consequences.

We urge legislators to support Governor Scott’s veto of H.121 and return next year to work on creating a better bill. Vermont can have strong privacy laws that protect consumers without hurting local businesses. Let’s find a solution that works for everyone.

Signed,

Associated Industries of Vermont

Central Vermont Chamber of Commerce

Heating and Cooling Contractors of Vermont

Vermont Association of Broadcasters

Vermont Chamber of Commerce

Vermont Fuel Dealers Association

Vermont Independent Restaurants

Vermont Retail and Grocers Association

Vermont Ski Areas Association

Vermont Technology Alliance

Vermont Vehicle and Automotive Distributors Association

Legislature Adjourns: What Businesses Need to Know

Legislature Adjourns: What Businesses Need to Know

The House and Senate gaveled out on Saturday at 2:07 AM and 1:18 AM respectively, following a tumultuous day of negotiations. Bills will now head to the Governor for his consideration and potential veto. Legislators are then set to return to the State House on June 17 to try and garner the two-thirds vote majority to override his decisions.

Below are the top headlines that you should know:

  • Housing and Act 250 Modernization: Vermont lawmakers and stakeholders have achieved a noteworthy feat: passing substantial reforms that exempt the building of housing units from Act 250 in villages, neighborhoods, and downtowns across the state. The legislation represents a historic compromise that will help reduce regulatory barriers to meet workforce housing needs. Following nearly a year of negotiations, the bill is set to introduce a process to create a tiered location-based approach through extensive community engagement over the next three years. It will tailor the applicability of Act 250 based on a development’s location and environmental sensitivity. It will also establish a professional board to make the Act 250 process more predictable, fair, and timely in every district. The Governor has been critical of the bill throughout the session, but it remains to be seen if he will sign it into law, veto it, or allow it to become law without his signature.
  • Property Taxes: The Vermont House and Senate reached a consensus on the annual property tax bill aimed at funding school districts’ budgets. The bill would increase the average education property tax bill by a crushing 13.8%. Key provisions that brought it down from 18% include utilizing a one-time state budget surplus of $25 million to mitigate property tax rates, introducing a new 3% surcharge tax on short-term rentals, and a $14.7 million tax on internet software access (aka the “cloud tax”). The absence of immediate structural reforms to education financing remains deeply concerning and the establishment of a study committee on the issue does little to temper fears that Vermonters will be facing extreme increases again, next year. All eyes will be on the Legislature in June to see if there are enough votes to sustain the Governor’s likely veto, and if a veto letter will provide further suggestions on how to reduce the double-digit increase before Vermonters receive their tax bills.
  • Data Privacy: In the final hours, Senators walked back their version of a data privacy bill that would have been regionally compatible and removed a private right of action. The Vermont Chamber has consistently advocated for three essential pillars, all of which we have advocated for in other policy proposals as well: regional compatibility, empowering the Attorney General as the sole enforcement authority, and funding small business education and training through trusted in-state technical assistance providers. The bill will now be sent to the Governor for his consideration and, if enacted, it would introduce rigorous and untested regulations impacting businesses of all sizes. While it aims to enhance consumer privacy, a goal supported by the Vermont Chamber, it also presents significant challenges for businesses. It would require substantial adjustments to data management practices that could impact operational efficiency, and leave education and outreach to the Attorney General.
  • Public Safety: To address the statewide uptick in retail theft, a bill passed by the House and Senate amends the penalties associated with various theft thresholds by increasing the penalty per repeat incident. Currently, theft of merchandise valued at less than $900 constitutes a misdemeanor offense, regardless of repeat offenses. The bill, which still awaits a verdict from the Governor, classifies a third offense as a felony if the stolen property falls within the $250 to $900 value range. This would entail substantial fines and potential jail time.
  • FY25 Budget: A conference committee reconciled differences before sending an $8.6 billion state budget to the Governor, who signaled at a press conference he would likely sign the bill, despite a 0.25% increase over his proposed budget.
  • Renewable Energy Standard: The Legislature passed a bill significantly expanding the state’s Renewable Energy Standard, with most retail electricity providers required to reach 100% renewable energy by 2030, and municipal providers by 2035. The bill has estimated cumulative costs to ratepayers ranging between $150 million and $450 million over the period from FY 2025 to FY 2035, with potential incremental electricity rate increases up to 6.7% by FY 2035.
  • Chemical Regulation: A bill banning chemicals such as PFAS, phthalates, formaldehyde, mercury, and lead from various consumer products is headed to the Governor for his consideration. The bill aligns with similar legislation in California, Minnesota, Maine, and Washington.
  • Liquor Liability Insurance: A miscellaneous alcohol bill passed by the Legislature delays the implementation of mandatory liquor liability insurance until July 1, 2026. This essential measure would meet the need for the insurance market to adjust due to increasing premium rates and reduced capacity for insurers to accept risk.
  • Job Advertisement Requirements: A bill mandating the inclusion of a wage range in job advertisements has been sent to the Governor for consideration. If signed, the law will go into effect in 2025 with a mandate for the Attorney General to work with stakeholders on education and outreach.
  • Captive Audience: A bill that limits the ability of a business to communicate with employees, if an employee felt the communication was of a religious or political nature, has passed and will move to the Governor for review.
  • Recovery and Resiliency: A bill that ensures considerations for businesses while enhancing government responses to natural disasters is expected to pass. The Vermont Chamber advocated for businesses to be included in the scope of the bill early in the session.
  • Business Incentives: Several studies and changes to Vermont’s primary business incentive, the Vermont Employment Growth Incentive (VEGI) program, were considered in the last two years. Ultimately, all that was agreed to was a two-year extension of the programmatic VEGI sunset.

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Vital changes were made by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee before they unanimously passed the data privacy bill. The legislation is now a strong consumer privacy bill without placing an undue burden on Vermont businesses. In particular, the committee removed the controversial private right of action which would result in collateral damage of rampant litigation placing undue strain on businesses and non-profits of all sizes. It instead asks a technology-based state council under the purview of the Agency of Digital Services to look into a path forward. Additionally, the bill brings it back to a place of interoperability with other New England state data privacy laws. The bill will likely be on the Senate floor for a vote next week.

Businesses testified in the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee on the importance of the Senate changes. Jim Hall, CEO of the Vermont Country Store, stated that the House-passed version of the bill would effectively slow down the economy. We encourage more businesses to reach out to their House and Senate members and ask them to support that bill as it has been amended by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee.

Vermont Chamber Continues to Raise Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Would Have Significant Ramifications for Small Businesses

Vermont Chamber Continues to Raise Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Would Have Significant Ramifications for Small Businesses

The Vermont Chamber and business leaders testified this week on the importance of balancing consumer protection with support for businesses. They emphasized the need for policymakers to ensure equitable and effective data privacy legislation by addressing the following areas of concern:

  1. Private Right of Action: Jim Hall, President and CEO of The Vermont Country Store gave a first-hand account of how a private right of action in privacy laws can lead to frivolous lawsuits against small businesses. A shakedown lawsuit over a California law previously cost The Vermont Country Store $100,000 over $2,000 worth of product sold.
  2. Regional Compatibility: If passed in its current form, the bill would make Vermont an outlier and complicate the ability of businesses to operate within its mandates.
  3. Business Education: Vermont will require a robust education plan involving Vermont’s trusted technical assistance providers to adapt to a new law. Trusted technical assistance providers need the resources and time to assist businesses through this transition.

The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee has shown that they are open to addressing the concerns of Vermont businesses, and we encourage you to contact your Senators to help ensure that they amend the legislation to be more balanced. 

The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for:

Removal of the Private Right of Action – The inclusion of a specific private right of action for data privacy violations poses significant risks of increased litigation, straining businesses and potentially enabling opportunistic legal actions akin to patent trolling. Empowering and supporting the Attorney General to enforce data privacy laws directly offers a more efficient path to protecting consumer interests without the potential consequences associated with a broad private right of action provision. Last month, a coalition of fourteen Vermont businesses and non-profit organizations sent a letter expressing their concerns about the bill’s private right of action.

Regional Compatibility The version of the bill passed by the House strayed from regional compatibility, which, if passed, would make Vermont an outlier and complicate the ability of businesses to operate within its mandates. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation projects that the absence of federal privacy legislation would burden U.S. small businesses with a $20–23 billion annual cost.

A Robust Education Plan A 2019 California Attorney General’s report estimated initial compliance costs for small businesses at $50,000 and for mid-sized businesses at $100,000, excluding ongoing costs, which may vary depending on interstate compatibility. Amid significant concerns regarding businesses’ ability to comprehend and navigate these complex requirements, Vermont will require a robust education plan involving Vermont’s trusted technical assistance providers.  

Vermont Chamber Raises Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Could Have Significant Implications for Businesses

Vermont Chamber Raises Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Could Have Significant Implications for Businesses

A bill that started as closely mirroring the existing data privacy laws of neighboring states has undergone several changes in recent weeks. These changes have sparked concerns regarding its jurisdiction and the potential of making Vermont an outlier rather than keeping it regionally aligned. The bill, which is expected to pass the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee this afternoon, includes a private right of action. The Vermont Chamber testified on the increased risk of litigation and the challenges Vermont businesses may face in understanding and implementing these new changes. The Vermont Chamber will continue our efforts to address these concerns for businesses throughout the session.

Before the Town Meeting Day break, a coalition of fourteen Vermont businesses and non-profit organizations sent a letter to the committee expressing their concerns about the bill’s private right of action. They suggested that alternative measures should be prioritized, focusing on prevention, remediation, and robust enforcement through mechanisms such as empowering the Attorney General’s Office. The Vermont Chamber will continue advocating for measures that prioritize prevention, and remediation, and ensure that businesses are informed and have access to technical assistance to comply with these significant regulations.