Important Appeal Provisions Secured in Act 250 Modernization and Housing Bill

Important Appeal Provisions Secured in Act 250 Modernization and Housing Bill

Amid a lengthy debate and amendments, the Senate is poised to approve H.687, which will be another step towards codifying the historic agreement on location-based jurisdiction. The bill would then need to go back to the House to review changes. The bill removes barriers to residential development in smart growth areas with interim exemptions. Notably, the Vermont Chamber successfully advocated for Act 250 appeals to remain with the Environmental Court. In a compromise to secure this, the future of appeals would be studied, and a report would be due back to the legislature for further consideration in 2026.

Here is a breakdown of much of what the Senate version of the bill would do over the next 3 years:

Development Exemptions: Establishes exemptions for all development in Tier 1A up to 49 units of housing in mixed-use developments in Tier 1B. Interim exemptions include:

  • All housing within downtowns until July 1, 2028.
  • Up to 75 units in new town centers, growth centers, and neighborhood development areas until July 1, 2028.
  • Up to 50 units within ¼ mile of village centers with zoning and in urbanized areas of 50,000 people near transit routes until July 1, 2028.

Name Change and Authority Expansion: The Natural Resources Board becomes the Land Use Review Board (LURB), the five-member board will be appointed by the Governor and have the authority to hear appeals and review regional plans and maps.

Tier 1A Area Application Process: Municipalities can apply from 2026 or after regional plan approval, with LURB guidelines issued by 2026.

Review of Applications for Tier 1A: LURB to manage the workload of District Commissions. Leaves Act 250 permit appeals at the Environmental Division of the Superior Court and will further study the issue.

Act 250 Amendments: Definitions added for forest blocks and habitat connectors. Rules to be adopted for Act 250 in areas with highly sensitive natural resources administration and mapping.

Regional Planning Process: LURB to review future land use maps and Tier 1B designations. RPCs submit to LURB plans and maps which must comply with requirements. Village areas are given Tier 1B status unless the town requests not to have it.

Appeal Changes: The threshold for appeals increased from 10 to 25 people.

Taxation Adjustments: A new property transfer tax rate of 2.5% for residential properties that will not be used as a principal residence, are fit for habitation all year, and are not used for a long-term rental. A temporary education property tax exemption was introduced for flood-impacted communities.

Safety Guidance for Short-Term Rental (STR) Operators: The Division of Fire Safety provides health and safety rules guidance for STR platforms; operators are required to post guidance.

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Senate Economic Development Passes Strong Data Privacy Bill

Vital changes were made by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee before they unanimously passed the data privacy bill. The legislation is now a strong consumer privacy bill without placing an undue burden on Vermont businesses. In particular, the committee removed the controversial private right of action which would result in collateral damage of rampant litigation placing undue strain on businesses and non-profits of all sizes. It instead asks a technology-based state council under the purview of the Agency of Digital Services to look into a path forward. Additionally, the bill brings it back to a place of interoperability with other New England state data privacy laws. The bill will likely be on the Senate floor for a vote next week.

Businesses testified in the House Commerce and Economic Development Committee on the importance of the Senate changes. Jim Hall, CEO of the Vermont Country Store, stated that the House-passed version of the bill would effectively slow down the economy. We encourage more businesses to reach out to their House and Senate members and ask them to support that bill as it has been amended by the Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee.

Op Ed: Eclipsing 802,000: Making Vermont a Destination for a Lifetime

Eclipsing 802,000: Making Vermont a Destination for a Lifetime

This commentary is by Kevin Chu, Executive Director of the Vermont Futures Project, and Amy Spear, Vice President of the Vermont Chamber of Commerce

On April 8th, over 160,000 people visited Vermont to observe the solar eclipse. Vermont briefly surpassed the 802,000 population goal that the Vermont Futures Project set last year, and we saw a glimpse of the vibrancy that’s possible in our state. Our downtowns and villages were full of life, full of people engaging in commerce and connecting with communities.

When totality occurred, there was a palpable sense of shared humanity and joy. For three and a half minutes, it didn’t matter if the person next to you was a visitor or resident. It didn’t matter if they were rich or poor, what languages they spoke, the color of their skin, or who they loved. For three and a half minutes, we were all human. What we observed in the sky was rightfully described by many as a once-in-a-lifetime event. What happened on the ground doesn’t have to be. Vermont needs more people, and more people need Vermont, whether it’s for a day, a week, months, or years.

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce recently convened Tourism Economy Day at the State House to highlight the collective impact of the visitor economy. The industry accounts for $3 billion in spending and supports 35,000 jobs (11.5% of Vermont’s workforce). Tourism also plays a profound role in connecting people to places. It unlocks much of the economic activity and vibrancy we see in our rural communities – visitors develop an affinity for Vermont, and some dream of moving here. We can make those dreams a reality by welcoming them with open arms and continuing to leverage the strength of our tourism economy to attract future residents.

Yes, doing so will mean we need to build more homes. It can also mean rural revitalization that taps into existing capacity in areas of the state that have depopulated. More housing and more people can make Vermont more affordable. It means a more robust workforce, thriving businesses, and a growing tax base that can support vital programs and services. Schools can be full of children again, and children won’t be told they need to leave Vermont to be successful. Opportunities to live, work, and play in this great state will be more abundant. A growing economy means that more needs, of more people, are being met more of the time.

We can’t afford to let Vermont be a once-in-a-lifetime place. For once, let’s make it a place that anybody can choose for a lifetime. 

_________________________________________

About the Vermont Futures Project

The Vermont Futures Project is an independent non-partisan organization pursuing answers to their mission question: How can we use data to support the evolution of Vermont’s economy towards a thriving future full of opportunity for all?

About the Vermont Chamber of Commerce

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce is dedicated to advancing the Vermont economy. Trusted by the businesses that make living, working, and thriving in Vermont possible, we prioritize collaboration and uphold the core values that define our state. As the preeminent not-for-profit business organization, we advocate, build community, and provide resources for businesses statewide.

House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

House Advances Property Tax Hikes and Delays Reform

Amid a $200 million increase in education spending, instead of making meaningful reform with cost containment measures, the House Ways and Means Committee has advanced legislation that includes double-digit property tax increases and adds more expenses for businesses. To pay for an increased property tax credit, the non-homestead tax would increase to 18%, 3% higher than the homestead rate. A cloud tax would also be implemented, including software as a service, platform as a service, and infrastructure as a service. Additionally, the bill proposes a $200,000 “Commission on the Future of Public Education” that would take 18 months to further study and make recommendations on how to improve the system. This means that rate increases will not be addressed this year and Vermonters could face another high increase again next year.

In written testimony, the Commissioner of the Tax Department stated, “The proposal to increase property tax credits for FY25 is not a reduction in total property taxes, but a cost shift that renters and businesses will pay. This is a puzzling approach when you consider the affordability crisis renters and employers currently confront.” Sending the issue to yet another study would not address the immediate needs of Vermonters. Meanwhile, in addition to property tax increases, the House has already passed $125 million in tax increases earlier this session.

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise With a Poison Pill

Housing and Act 250: A Historic Compromise with a Poison Pill

The Senate Natural Resources and Energy Committee combined the Senate’s housing bill with the House’s Act 250 modernization bill, creating a 171-page omnibus bill. While much of the legislation incorporates a historic compromise on Act 250, a substantial poison pill remains. Appeals of Act 250 permits would move from the environmental courts to a newly established professional board. The Vermont Chamber is advocating against this transition. A legal appeal of a complicated development process requires a legal review in a court, not an informal review by a politically appointed quasi-judicial board that does not have legal expertise.

The Vermont Chamber has supported a compromise of establishing a working group to dig into underlying issues that result in Act 250 appeals leading to timely and expensive disputes and ultimately development delays and how best to address them. The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee has done a walk-through of the bill and is looking at opportunities to bolster parts of the bill that will address Vermont’s housing crisis. With only weeks remaining in the session, the bill still has several more hoops to jump through before reaching the Governor’s desk. As it currently stands, it is poised for a veto.

Crucial Tax Questions Remain Unanswered with Only Weeks Remaining

Crucial Tax Questions Remain Unanswered with Only Weeks Remaining

The question remains, how will the $230 million education fund deficit that is slated to increase property taxes by 18% be addressed? The House has already passed $125 million in tax increases, in addition to the $100 million payroll tax passed last year, but none are set to alleviate the property tax burden and will only further limit the taxing capacity of Vermonters and businesses.

The House Ways and Means Committee is considering a $20 million “cloud tax” on internet-based services and a potential 3% short-term rental surcharge related to the yield bill, which determines Vermont’s statewide property tax rate. The bill’s original scope has been scaled back, however, an increase in the non-homestead rate to 18.57% seems likely to remain. This shift would burden non-homestead payers, including businesses, with an additional $25 million in taxes to subsidize the property tax credit for homeowners.

Vermont Chamber Continues to Raise Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Would Have Significant Ramifications for Small Businesses

Vermont Chamber Continues to Raise Concerns that Data Privacy Bill Would Have Significant Ramifications for Small Businesses

The Vermont Chamber and business leaders testified this week on the importance of balancing consumer protection with support for businesses. They emphasized the need for policymakers to ensure equitable and effective data privacy legislation by addressing the following areas of concern:

  1. Private Right of Action: Jim Hall, President and CEO of The Vermont Country Store gave a first-hand account of how a private right of action in privacy laws can lead to frivolous lawsuits against small businesses. A shakedown lawsuit over a California law previously cost The Vermont Country Store $100,000 over $2,000 worth of product sold.
  2. Regional Compatibility: If passed in its current form, the bill would make Vermont an outlier and complicate the ability of businesses to operate within its mandates.
  3. Business Education: Vermont will require a robust education plan involving Vermont’s trusted technical assistance providers to adapt to a new law. Trusted technical assistance providers need the resources and time to assist businesses through this transition.

The Senate Economic Development, Housing, and General Affairs Committee has shown that they are open to addressing the concerns of Vermont businesses, and we encourage you to contact your Senators to help ensure that they amend the legislation to be more balanced. 

The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for:

Removal of the Private Right of Action – The inclusion of a specific private right of action for data privacy violations poses significant risks of increased litigation, straining businesses and potentially enabling opportunistic legal actions akin to patent trolling. Empowering and supporting the Attorney General to enforce data privacy laws directly offers a more efficient path to protecting consumer interests without the potential consequences associated with a broad private right of action provision. Last month, a coalition of fourteen Vermont businesses and non-profit organizations sent a letter expressing their concerns about the bill’s private right of action.

Regional Compatibility The version of the bill passed by the House strayed from regional compatibility, which, if passed, would make Vermont an outlier and complicate the ability of businesses to operate within its mandates. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation projects that the absence of federal privacy legislation would burden U.S. small businesses with a $20–23 billion annual cost.

A Robust Education Plan A 2019 California Attorney General’s report estimated initial compliance costs for small businesses at $50,000 and for mid-sized businesses at $100,000, excluding ongoing costs, which may vary depending on interstate compatibility. Amid significant concerns regarding businesses’ ability to comprehend and navigate these complex requirements, Vermont will require a robust education plan involving Vermont’s trusted technical assistance providers.  

Senate Finance Takes Up the $125 Million of Taxes Passed by the House

Senate Finance Takes Up the $125 Million of Taxes Passed by the House

The Senate Finance Committee began its review of the $125 million in tax increases and $6 million in increased fees passed by the House. During the run-through with Legislative Council and the Joint Fiscal Office, they raised important questions on who would be impacted and how these proposals would make Vermont compare with other states. The Chair, Sen. Ann Cummings (D-Washington), made it clear that they will welcome diverse testimony into the committee in the weeks ahead, including businesses.

The tax proposals include an increase in the Global Intangible Low Tax Income and Foreign Derived Intangible Income taxes, raising the top marginal tax rate of corporate income tax, creating a new personal income tax bracket of 11.75% starting at $500,000 of income, and a property transfer tax increase. The Vermont Chamber will continue to advocate for action that corrects systems that are not working instead of increasing taxation on residents and businesses. In doing so, we can secure Vermont’s future as a vibrant and welcoming place for all, today and tomorrow.

Tom Dee Selected as the 2024 Citizen of the Year

Tom Dee Selected as the 2024 Citizen of the Year

The Vermont Chamber of Commerce has selected Thomas A. Dee, President and CEO of Southwestern Vermont Medical Center (SVMC) as the 2024 Citizen of the Year. He was selected for the award for his outstanding contributions to southern Vermont, particularly his impactful efforts in health care and community development. The award will be presented at a celebratory event on Thursday, August 1, at the Everett Mansion at Southern Vermont College in Bennington.

The award is presented annually by the Vermont Chamber to honor an outstanding Vermonter who has made major contributions to the betterment of Vermont; has been distinguished through outstanding service to their community and region; and typifies the true spirit of service and self-sacrifice in representing the finest ideals of Vermont citizenship. 

“Tom has put heart and soul into improving the quality of health care – and the quality of life – in southern Vermont, while also taking visionary steps to ensure that excellent health care will be sustainable in the decades to come,” stated Kathy Fisher, Chair, SVMC Board of Directors. “And, given Tom’s understanding of the impact of socioeconomic factors on population health, he has also played a vital role in the redevelopment of downtown Bennington.” 

“I’m humbled by this honor and grateful for the attention it brings to SVMC and the community of Bennington, which I call home,” said Tom Dee. “I have always strived to be a good steward of this health care system and, while I consider myself a small part of its more than 100-year history, I understand the crucial role we have in the communities we serve and in the State of Vermont. This has always motivated me to move SVMC forward and support our community, where I can.”

“In his 14-year tenure, Tom Dee’s dedication to SVMC and southwestern Vermont has been pivotal to improving the local economy, and raising the bar for what it means to be a community leader,” stated Betsy Bishop, President of the Vermont Chamber. “We are proud to award this recognition to Tom Dee and look forward to bringing Vermonters together to celebrate in Bennington.” 

The award dates back to 1964 and previous recipients include Senator Patrick Leahy, Barbara Snelling, Antonio Pomerleau, and Ken Squier. Registration to attend the celebration is now open. For more information, visit the Citizen of the Year event website

About Tom Dee

Thomas A. Dee is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Southwestern Vermont Medical Center (SVMC) in Bennington, VT. Dee has over 33 years of experience as a hospital CEO. Under Dee’s management, the integrated health system has attained twelve consecutive years of positive operating performance and has been recognized with numerous state and national awards for quality of care, community leadership and workplace excellence.

He was recently named to Becker’s Hospital Review’s list of 110 rural hospital and health system CEOs to know for 2024. Dee led in the planning and implementation of the affiliation of SVMC with Dartmouth Health, commencing in 2012 with the formation of Dartmouth-Hitchcock Putnam Group Practice – a 150 member multi-specialty provider group. In 2023, SVMC became an institutional member of Dartmouth Health.

Before SVMC, Dee worked for Health Alliance in Kingston, NY, an integrated health system of three hospitals. He was president and Chief Executive Officer of the 222-bed Benedictine Hospital for more than 17 years. Dee has a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and a master’s in Healthcare Administration, both from Xavier University in Ohio.

Act 250 Modernization Bill Passes House

Act 250 Modernization Bill Passes House

H.687 was the subject of lengthy, and at times fiery, House floor sessions this week. The bill establishes a plan and timeline to modernize Act 250 with a tiered and location-based jurisdiction, including exemptions in smart growth areas. The proposed changes for Vermont land use would take place over the coming years to allow for considerable public outreach and input. In total, there were 11 amendments to the bill with all but one passing. This included an amendment to extend Act 250 housing exemptions passed last year in the HOME Act. The bill was ultimately passed by the House on a split voice vote, sending a message to the Senate that further changes will need to be made if the bill is to garner enough widespread support to withstand a potential veto.

The bill will now go to the Senate, where the Natural Resources Committee has been reviewing S.311, the Senate’s housing and Act 250 omnibus bill, in anticipation of receiving H.687. The Vermont Chamber testified before the committee this week in favor of the approach to Act 250 appeals that S.311 makes, keeping appeals to Act 250 decisions in the court with increased support. The committee is likely to make H.687 the final vessel for Act 250 modernization this session.